netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] bnx2x: align define usage to satisfy static checkers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20130110.144020.1382112885747043594.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Thu, 10 Jan 2013 14:40:20 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	ariele@...adcom.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] bnx2x: align define usage to satisfy static
 checkers

From: "Ariel Elior" <ariele@...adcom.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2013 19:04:35 +0200

> Static checkers complained that the E1H_FUNC_MAX define is used
> incorrectly in bnx2x_pretend_func(). The complaint was justified,
> although its not a real bug, as the first part of the conditional
> protects us in this case (a real bug would happen if a VF tried to
> use the pretend func, but there are no VFs in E1H chips).
> 
> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ariel Elior <ariele@...adcom.com>

Applied.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html