[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130112180058.0289baba@stein>
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2013 18:00:58 +0100
From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
To: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
Cc: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
Stephan Gatzka <stephan.gatzka@...il.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux1394-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 5/6] firewire net: IPv6 support (RFC3146).
On Jan 12 Stefan Richter wrote:
> At least one thing which is still missing (also
> missing in Stephan's patch from previous week) is the RFC 3146 clause 5
> Configuration ROM entry.
Another thing: As far as I understand, the current code assumes that
peers will use the same unicast_FIFO for IPv4 unicast as for IPv6
unicast. This is not necessarily true. Either firewire-net needs to
maintain two lists of peers (one for IPv4, another for IPv6), or it needs
to maintain two unicast_FIFOs per peer.
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-===-= ---= -==--
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists