[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50F19A1B.7050200@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2013 18:15:07 +0100
From: Stephan Gatzka <stephan.gatzka@...il.com>
To: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
CC: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux1394-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 5/6] firewire net: IPv6 support (RFC3146).
> Another thing: As far as I understand, the current code assumes that
> peers will use the same unicast_FIFO for IPv4 unicast as for IPv6
> unicast. This is not necessarily true. Either firewire-net needs to
> maintain two lists of peers (one for IPv4, another for IPv6), or it needs
> to maintain two unicast_FIFOs per peer.
>
Thanks for pointing that out. I would go for two unicast_Fifos per peer.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists