[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1358183396.8744.3100.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 09:09:56 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [Patch net-next v3] netpoll: fix a rtnl lock assertion failure
On Mon, 2013-01-14 at 09:07 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Strange, why dont we call netdev_master_upper_dev_get() instead ?
>
>
What I meant is : the result of this check might be of little use, if we
don't hold any lock preventing another thread to change things behind
us.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists