[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50F69CB0.8040900@linux-ipv6.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 21:27:28 +0900
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
To: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC(v2) net-next 08/13] ipv6: Do not deoend on rt->n in ip6_dst_lookup_tail().
Cong Wang wrote:
> s/deoend/depend/ in $subject...
>
> On 01/16/2013 12:46 AM, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
>> ---
>> net/ipv6/ip6_output.c | 8 ++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c b/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c
>> index 9fc5d1d..b2fe048 100644
>> --- a/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c
>> +++ b/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c
>> @@ -921,8 +921,12 @@ static int ip6_dst_lookup_tail(struct sock *sk,
>> * dst entry of the nexthop router
>> */
>> rt = (struct rt6_info *) *dst;
>> - n = rt->n;
>> - if (n && !(n->nud_state & NUD_VALID)) {
>> + rcu_read_lock_bh();
>> + n = __ipv6_neigh_lookup_noref(rt->dst.dev, rt6_nexthop(rt, &fl6->daddr));
>> + err = n && !(n->nud_state & NUD_VALID) ? -EINVAL : 0;
>> + rcu_read_unlock_bh();
>> +
>> + if (err) {
>
> Are you sure the logic here equals?
>
> In the original code, we could return 0 even we enter this if branch,
> but after your patch, it seems it will return -EINVAL?
>
err is always updated after the branch, or return 0;
--yoshfuji
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists