[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50F64D96.4090709@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 14:49:58 +0800
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC(v2) net-next 08/13] ipv6: Do not deoend on rt->n in ip6_dst_lookup_tail().
s/deoend/depend/ in $subject...
On 01/16/2013 12:46 AM, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki wrote:
> Signed-off-by: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
> ---
> net/ipv6/ip6_output.c | 8 ++++++--
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c b/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c
> index 9fc5d1d..b2fe048 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c
> @@ -921,8 +921,12 @@ static int ip6_dst_lookup_tail(struct sock *sk,
> * dst entry of the nexthop router
> */
> rt = (struct rt6_info *) *dst;
> - n = rt->n;
> - if (n && !(n->nud_state & NUD_VALID)) {
> + rcu_read_lock_bh();
> + n = __ipv6_neigh_lookup_noref(rt->dst.dev, rt6_nexthop(rt, &fl6->daddr));
> + err = n && !(n->nud_state & NUD_VALID) ? -EINVAL : 0;
> + rcu_read_unlock_bh();
> +
> + if (err) {
Are you sure the logic here equals?
In the original code, we could return 0 even we enter this if branch,
but after your patch, it seems it will return -EINVAL?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists