netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] ipv6: fix ipv6_prefix_equal64

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <50F771BE.7070309@linux-ipv6.org>
Date:	Thu, 17 Jan 2013 12:36:30 +0900
From:	YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] ipv6: fix ipv6_prefix_equal64_half mask conversion

David Miller wrote:
> From: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@...aro.org>
> Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 22:30:17 +0100
> 
>> Fix the 64bit optimized version of ipv6_prefix_equal to convert the
>> bitmask to network byte order only after the bit-shift.
>>
>> The bug was introduced in:
>>
>> 3867517 ipv6: 64bit version of ipv6_prefix_equal().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@...aro.org>
> 
> Applied, thanks.
> 

Sorry for the mess.

I'm not seeing this in net-next so far, though I can see my
patch for ip6_flow_hdr() which you "applied" later.
Do I miss something?

--yoshfuji

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html