netdev - Re: IPsec AH use of ahash

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <50FBF25C.4030604@ahsoftware.de>
Date:	Sun, 20 Jan 2013 14:34:20 +0100
From:	Alexander Holler <holler@...oftware.de>
To:	Tom St Denis <tstdenis@...iptictech.com>
CC:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Eric Dumazet <erdnetdev@...il.com>,
	"Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P" <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	steffen klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
	herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>,
	Mike Galbraith <bitbucket@...ine.de>
Subject: Re: IPsec AH use of ahash

Am 20.01.2013 13:56, schrieb Tom St Denis:

> You should really try running checkpatch.pl over code that's already in the kernel before you call out new contributors on it.
>
> How is this supposed to not be adversarial when I can't even use the Kernel source itself as a reference?

In case of the kernel the chicken and egg problem can be answered 
without any questions, most source existed before checkpatch.pl (evolved 
to the current state).

Regards,

Alexander
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html