[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50FD96E4.1020607@linux-ipv6.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 04:28:36 +0900
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Rate Limitation of Router Reachability Probing for possible dead
routers (is Re: ipv6: Do not depend on rt->n in rt6_probe().)
(2013年01月22日 03:41), YOSHIFUJI Hideaki wrote:
> (2013年01月22日 03:28), Dan Carpenter wrote:
>> Hello YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明,
>>
>> This is a semi-automatic email about new static checker warnings.
>>
>> The patch 2152caea7196: "ipv6: Do not depend on rt->n in
>> rt6_probe()." from Jan 17, 2013, leads to the following Smatch
>> complaint:
>>
>> net/ipv6/route.c:495 rt6_probe()
>> error: we previously assumed 'neigh' could be null (see line 490)
>>
>> net/ipv6/route.c
>> 489
>> 490 if (!neigh ||
>> ^^^^^
>> New test.
>>
>> 491 time_after(jiffies, neigh->updated + rt->rt6i_idev->cnf.rtr_probe_interval)) {
>> 492 struct in6_addr mcaddr;
>> 493 struct in6_addr *target;
>> 494
>> 495 neigh->updated = jiffies;
>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> Old dereference.
>>
>> 496
>> 497 if (neigh)
>> ^^^^^
>> Another new test.
>
> Oh, right, I'll fix. Thanks!
Ok, fix is easy, but in fact, we have broken router reachability
probing.
Here rt->n was neighbour entry for (unreachable) router.
The specification says, we SHOUDLD probe such router, but we
should have some rate limit (once per minute, or so).
We used "rt->n->updated" for this purpose, but now, if NS failed,
we may immediately removes neighbour entry for it. So,
we might continue sending NS to dead router every 1 second.
Any ideas?
--yoshfuji
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists