[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130121.154425.239941234471254414.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 15:44:25 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Rate Limitation of Router Reachability Probing for possible
dead routers (is Re: ipv6: Do not depend on rt->n in rt6_probe().)
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 04:28:36 +0900
> Ok, fix is easy, but in fact, we have broken router reachability
> probing.
>
> Here rt->n was neighbour entry for (unreachable) router.
> The specification says, we SHOUDLD probe such router, but we
> should have some rate limit (once per minute, or so).
>
> We used "rt->n->updated" for this purpose, but now, if NS failed,
> we may immediately removes neighbour entry for it. So,
> we might continue sending NS to dead router every 1 second.
>
> Any ideas?
I don't see exactly how looking up the neigh on demand is different
from using a cached one in this context.
In both cases there should be a neigh entry in nd_tbl, why would
there not be one?
If necessary, you can decide to mark entries in such a way that
they would have a lower priority for neigh GC purging if that
is the issue.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists