[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1359035768.12374.2083.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 05:56:08 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Frank Li <Frank.Li@...escale.com>
Cc: lznuaa@...il.com, shawn.guo@...aro.org, B38611@...escale.com,
davem@...emloft.net, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, s.hauer@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1 net-next] net: fec: add napi support to improve
proformance
On Thu, 2013-01-24 at 15:58 +0800, Frank Li wrote:
>
> static irqreturn_t
> @@ -805,6 +823,7 @@ fec_enet_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
> struct net_device *ndev = dev_id;
> struct fec_enet_private *fep = netdev_priv(ndev);
> uint int_events;
> + ulong flags;
> irqreturn_t ret = IRQ_NONE;
>
> do {
> @@ -813,7 +832,14 @@ fec_enet_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
>
> if (int_events & FEC_ENET_RXF) {
> ret = IRQ_HANDLED;
> - fec_enet_rx(ndev);
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&fep->hw_lock, flags);
You already are in a irq safe context, spin_lock() should be ok
> + /* Disable the RX interrupt */
> + if (napi_schedule_prep(&fep->napi)) {
> + fec_enet_rx_int_is_enabled(ndev, false);
> + __napi_schedule(&fep->napi);
> + }
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fep->hw_lock, flags);
spin_unlock();
> }
>
Same remark for the spin_lock_irqsave(&fep->tmreg_lock, flags) in
fec_enet_tx()
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists