netdev - Re: [PATCH] tcp: frto should not set snd

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20130206.161919.1732889798702305226.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Wed, 06 Feb 2013 16:19:19 -0500 (EST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	pasik@....fi
Cc:	ncardwell@...gle.com, ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi,
	eric.dumazet@...il.com, hannes@...essinduktion.org,
	stephen@...workplumber.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	ycheng@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcp: frto should not set snd_cwnd to 0

From: Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@....fi>
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 23:13:43 +0200

> On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 03:55:04PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>
>> Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 14:49:04 -0500
>> 
>> > On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 7:14 AM, Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi> wrote:
>> >> [PATCH 1/1] tcp: fix for zero packets_in_flight was too broad
>> >>
>> >> There are transients during normal FRTO procedure during which
>> >> the packets_in_flight can go to zero between write_queue state
>> >> updates and firing the resulting segments out. As FRTO processing
>> >> occurs during that window the check must be more precise to
>> >> not match "spuriously" :-). More specificly, e.g., when
>> >> packets_in_flight is zero but FLAG_DATA_ACKED is true the problematic
>> >> branch that set cwnd into zero would not be taken and new segments
>> >> might be sent out later.
>> >>
>> >> Only compile tested.
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>
>>  ...
>> > Acked-by: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>
>> 
>> Applied, thanks everyone.
>>
> 
> Hmm.. are we missing CC stable@...nel.org in these patches? 
> I guess 3.6.x is already EOL, but it'd be nice to get this bug fixed also in 3.7.x ..

We never CC: stable on networking patches, I queue them up manually
and submit them at a time of my own choosing.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html