[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1360621271.2701.20.camel@bwh-desktop.uk.solarflarecom.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 22:21:11 +0000
From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: <hannes@...essinduktion.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>, <erik.hugne@...csson.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipv6: don't accept multicast traffic with scop 0
On Mon, 2013-02-11 at 14:52 -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
> Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 20:48:35 +0100
>
> > On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 01:48:51PM +0100, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> >> + /*
> >> + * RFC4291 2.7
> >> + * Nodes must not originate a packet to a multicast address whose scop
> >> + * field contains the reserved value 0; if such a packet is received, it
> >> + * must be silently dropped.
> >
> > Just nit-picking: The field is actually called scop without e, as pointed out
> > by three erratas to RFC4291. :)
>
> That's funny because I added the 'e' to your patches while applying
> them, it just looks completely stupid to refer to this things as
> 'scop'.
It seems to be a long Unix tradition to creat names with trailing silent
vowels removed; this is hardly uniq.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists