[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130211144243.704c6097@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 14:42:43 -0800
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, <hannes@...essinduktion.org>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
<erik.hugne@...csson.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipv6: don't accept multicast traffic with scop 0
On Mon, 11 Feb 2013 22:21:11 +0000
Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-02-11 at 14:52 -0500, David Miller wrote:
> > From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
> > Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 20:48:35 +0100
> >
> > > On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 01:48:51PM +0100, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> > >> + /*
> > >> + * RFC4291 2.7
> > >> + * Nodes must not originate a packet to a multicast address whose scop
> > >> + * field contains the reserved value 0; if such a packet is received, it
> > >> + * must be silently dropped.
> > >
> > > Just nit-picking: The field is actually called scop without e, as pointed out
> > > by three erratas to RFC4291. :)
> >
> > That's funny because I added the 'e' to your patches while applying
> > them, it just looks completely stupid to refer to this things as
> > 'scop'.
>
> It seems to be a long Unix tradition to creat names with trailing silent
> vowels removed; this is hardly uniq.
>
> Ben.
>
Aussie's would call it scopie
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists