[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1360622953.8633.36.camel@dcbw.foobar.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 16:49:13 -0600
From: Dan Williams <dcbw@...hat.com>
To: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, hannes@...essinduktion.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org,
erik.hugne@...csson.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipv6: don't accept multicast traffic with scop 0
On Mon, 2013-02-11 at 22:21 +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-02-11 at 14:52 -0500, David Miller wrote:
> > From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
> > Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 20:48:35 +0100
> >
> > > On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 01:48:51PM +0100, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> > >> + /*
> > >> + * RFC4291 2.7
> > >> + * Nodes must not originate a packet to a multicast address whose scop
> > >> + * field contains the reserved value 0; if such a packet is received, it
> > >> + * must be silently dropped.
> > >
> > > Just nit-picking: The field is actually called scop without e, as pointed out
> > > by three erratas to RFC4291. :)
> >
> > That's funny because I added the 'e' to your patches while applying
> > them, it just looks completely stupid to refer to this things as
> > 'scop'.
>
> It seems to be a long Unix tradition to creat names with trailing silent
> vowels removed; this is hardly uniq.
You had to buy vowels from Pat back then, and people were stingy with
their hard-earned money. And then if you got the vowel wrong it was no
longer your turn. So understandably people were reluctant to use vowels
much.
Dan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists