[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1360681070.13993.2.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 06:57:50 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@....ntt.co.jp>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] tcp: fix FIN_WAIT2 timer expression in /proc/net/tcp
On Tue, 2013-02-12 at 21:54 +0900, Toshiaki Makita wrote:
> When tcp_fin_timeout is greater than 60, /proc/net/tcp shows
> FIN_WAIT2 keepalive timer as expires in (tcp_fin_timeout - 60)
> sec. This is confusing because the timer is not for keepalive
> and the socket needs another timewait timer to disappear.
>
> Signed-off-by: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@....ntt.co.jp>
> ---
> net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c | 23 +++++++++++++++--------
> net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c | 23 +++++++++++++++--------
> 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
> index 629937d..32bde0e 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
> @@ -2656,17 +2656,24 @@ static void get_tcp4_sock(struct sock *sk, struct seq_file *f, int i, int *len)
> int rx_queue;
>
> if (icsk->icsk_pending == ICSK_TIME_RETRANS) {
> - timer_active = 1;
> - timer_expires = icsk->icsk_timeout;
> + timer_active = 1;
> + timer_expires = icsk->icsk_timeout;
> } else if (icsk->icsk_pending == ICSK_TIME_PROBE0) {
> - timer_active = 4;
> - timer_expires = icsk->icsk_timeout;
> + timer_active = 4;
> + timer_expires = icsk->icsk_timeout;
> } else if (timer_pending(&sk->sk_timer)) {
> - timer_active = 2;
> - timer_expires = sk->sk_timer.expires;
> + if (sk->sk_state == TCP_FIN_WAIT2 && sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DEAD)) {
> + timer_active = 3;
> + timer_expires = sk->sk_timer.expires +
> + (tp->linger2 >= 0 ?
> + TCP_TIMEWAIT_LEN : 0);
> + } else {
> + timer_active = 2;
> + timer_expires = sk->sk_timer.expires;
> + }
> } else {
> - timer_active = 0;
> - timer_expires = jiffies;
> + timer_active = 0;
> + timer_expires = jiffies;
> }
>
I find this patch confusing :
1) Please don't change the indentation for a bug fix
2) You add a new 'active=3' field, that some user space
reading /proc/net/tcp wont expect.
So the changelog is not matching the changes.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists