[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1360916778.3463.26.camel@ubuntu-vm-makita>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 17:26:18 +0900
From: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@....ntt.co.jp>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] tcp: fix FIN_WAIT2 timer expression in /proc/net/tcp
On Tue, 2013-02-12 at 07:13 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-02-12 at 06:57 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> > I find this patch confusing :
> >
> > 1) Please don't change the indentation for a bug fix
OK, I will separate changes of indentation to another patch.
> >
> > 2) You add a new 'active=3' field, that some user space
> > reading /proc/net/tcp wont expect.
I think, at least, it's harmless and beneficial for netstat.
Even without this change, a keepalive timer of an orphaned
FIN_WAIT2 socket will eventually turn to a timewait timer,
and by default, or when tcp_fin_timeout is 60, there will be
only timewait timers for orphaned FIN_WAIT2.
If the socket is not closed and SO_KEEPALIVE is set,
a keepalive timer of FIN_WAIT2 will also be shown in
/proc/net/tcp, whose state isn't equal to above one.
I don't know any application that will be damaged with this
change, and I think the possibility that this change affects
a bad influence to userspace is low.
Please advise.
> >
> > So the changelog is not matching the changes.
>
> Also, net/ipv4/inet_diag.c was not changed
>
thank you for pointing out my mistake.
I will correct it, too.
Toshiaki Makita
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists