netdev - Re: [patch net-next RFC] tbf: handle gso skbs properly

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130215142847.GA1543@minipsycho.orion>
Date:	Fri, 15 Feb 2013 15:28:47 +0100
From:	Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
	jhs@...atatu.com, kuznet@....inr.ac.ru, j.vimal@...il.com
Subject: Re: [patch net-next RFC] tbf: handle gso skbs properly

Thanks for review Eric. I will process your suggestions and submit the
patch.


Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 03:18:49PM CET, eric.dumazet@...il.com wrote:
>On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 13:44 +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> According to Eric's suggestion, when gso skb can't be sent in one mtu
>> time, resegment it.
>> 
>> Note that helper will be moved to sch_api.c probably so it can be used
>> by other code.
>> 
>> Also, I'm not sure similar patch to this can be done for act_police. I
>> have to look at that more closely.


Any idea how to fix this in act_police? I believe we can't use the same
approach since there is no queue there.

Thanks.

Jiri
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html