[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <511FD5A7.3050207@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2013 13:53:27 -0500
From: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@...hat.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next (V2)] ipv6: Queue fragments per interface
for multicast/link-local addresses.
On 02/16/2013 11:15 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-02-16 at 20:39 +0900, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki wrote:
>
>> Could you elaborate, please?
>>
>> The patch does not compare incoming interface if address is
>> non-link-local unicast address.
>
> There must be a reason ipv6 reasm is duplicated in
> net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_conntrack_reasm.c
>
> netfilter uses the notion of ct zone, and several nics can belong to
> same zone.
>
> Anyway your patch touches netfilter land, so must be CC to netfilter
> guys.
>
> M: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
> M: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
> L: netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org
>
Looks like netfilter implementation will benefit from a similar patch as
well. I like the idea of tagging the reassembly queue with the
interface and I think it would have application in netfilter as well.
Link-local traffic is limited to the interface already, so that
shouldn't break netfilter assumptions. Multicast traffic is also bound
to an interface since group membership is per interface. If multiple
interfaces are receiving the same fragmented multicast traffic, we want
multiple reassembly queues, or we'd end up discarding.
-vlad
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists