[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <OF02E8A5C2.4BBAEF8D-ON85257B20.007D6D06-85257B20.007DED1A@us.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 17:55:27 -0500
From: David Stevens <dlstevens@...ibm.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
netdev-owner@...r.kernel.org,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] generalize VXLAN forwarding tables
netdev-owner@...r.kernel.org wrote on 02/28/2013 05:27:55 PM:
> From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
> On Thu, 2013-02-28 at 14:23 -0500, David L Stevens wrote:
>
> > + /* if there are multiple destinations, send copies */
> > + for (rdst = rdst0->remote_next; rdst; rdst = rdst->remote_next) {
> > + struct sk_buff *skb1;
> > +
> > + skb1 = skb_clone(skb, GFP_ATOMIC);
> > + rc1 = vxlan_xmit_one(skb1, dev, rdst, did_rsc);
> > + if (rc == NETDEV_TX_OK)
> > + rc = rc1;
> > + }
> > +
> > + rc1 = vxlan_xmit_one(skb, dev, rdst0, did_rsc);
> > + if (rc == NETDEV_TX_OK)
> > + rc = rc1;
> > + return rc;
> > +}
>
>
> It looks like vxlan_xmit_one() will overwrite header
>
> So skb_clone() is probably not what you wanted ?
We're only prepending encapsulation headers, and we
do skb_cow_head() for each of those in vxlan_xmit_one().
This skb should be just the original , unencapsulated
packet which is identical in all copies.
+-DLS
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists