[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130304080509.EDF323E206B@localhost>
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2013 16:05:09 +0800
From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
To: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <nobuhiro.iwamatsu.yj@...esas.com>,
Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org,
magnus.damm@...il.com, kda@...ux-powerpc.org,
horms+renesas@...ge.net.au
Subject: Re: [PATCHi v2] net: sh_eth: Add support of device tree probe
On Thu, 14 Feb 2013 11:56:57 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <nobuhiro.iwamatsu.yj@...esas.com> wrote:
> (2013/02/14 10:24), Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
> >> + if (np&& of_device_is_available(np)) {
> >> + pd = sh_eth_parse_dt(&pdev->dev, ndev);
> >> + if (pdev->dev.platform_data) {
> >> + struct sh_eth_plat_data *tmp =
> >> + pdev->dev.platform_data;
> >> + pd->set_mdio_gate = tmp->set_mdio_gate;
> >> + pd->needs_init = tmp->needs_init;
> >> + }
> >> + } else
> >> +#endif
> >
> > sh_eth_parse_dt() was defined for both CONFIG_OF and !CONFIG_OF.
> > But it is called only from CONFIG_OF ?
> >
>
> Because of_device_is_available needs CONFIG_OF.
> I already send a patch which add empty function of of_device_is_available.
> If this was apply, this ifdef becomes without need.
Actually, there shouldn't be any reason for a device driver to call
of_device_is_available() on its own node at all. If the device is not
available, then a platform_device won't be created. "if (np)" here is
sufficient.
g.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists