[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <D859EF9A-19A9-4F74-B59D-28FADBCE338A@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 15:40:06 +0100
From: Wolf-Bastian Pöttner <poettner@....cs.tu-bs.de>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: Linux-zigbee-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
alex.bluesman.smirnov@...il.com, dbaryshkov@...il.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/ieee802154/6lowpan: Fix initialization for fragment offset
Hi!
Nope. The patch fixes a problem in code that is not in mainline yet. However, people on the linux-zigbee mailing list found it a good idea to commit this change to mainline to avoid the problem from arising.
I see, you disagree. Nevermind. ;)
Bastian
--
Wolf-Bastian Pöttner Institut für Betriebssysteme & Rechnerverbund
Tel.: +49-531-391-3265 Mühlenpfordtstrasse 23
Fax.: +49-531-391-5936 TU Braunschweig D-38106 Braunschweig
Am 13.03.2013 um 15:38 schrieb David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>:
> From: Wolf-Bastian Pöttner <poettner@....cs.tu-bs.de>
> Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 08:50:54 +0100
>
>> offset has to be initialized, otherwise the *first* fragment will
>> be discarded and reassembly cannot happen.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Alan Ott <alan@...nal11.us>
>
> 'offset' is never used unless lowpan_fetch_skb_u8(skb, &offset)
> succeeds, in which case it will be initialized properly. Otherwise we
> unlock and drop the SKB and make no references whatsoever to 'offset'.
>
> I suspect you saw some compiler warning about 'offset' being
> uninitialized, and are just blindly trying to shut this warning up.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists