netdev - Re: Can we rely on ethernet header padding?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 20 Mar 2013 10:54:26 +0100
From:	Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>
To:	Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Cc:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Can we rely on ethernet header padding?

On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 02:25:53PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> 
> My view is that the bridge code must check before assuming headroom.
> But because of that, it means a packet copy would be necessary for cases
> where packets arrive without enough headroom.

Yes, but for most users this is better than a crash. How about issuing a
WARN_ONCE() in such case so that we avoid writing out of the buffer but
still allow developers (and users who check logs) to catch the problem?

                                                          Michal Kubecek

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html