netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/1]core:Change a wrong explain about dev_get_by

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1363793549.3333.12.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date:	Wed, 20 Mar 2013 08:32:29 -0700
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	tingwei liu <tingw.liu@...il.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
	davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1]core:Change a wrong explain about dev_get_by_name

On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 17:33 +0800, tingwei liu wrote:
> From 5d787e8c3725efa6af3036eeb52aba1905c70de9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: root <root@...ux-19.site>
> Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 17:39:59 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] Change a wrong explain about dev_get_by_name
> 

No changelog ? This patch really needs a changelog.

I have no idea why we should document this function being not safe in
irq context.

Most part of networking stack is non safe in hard irq context.

Should we add a comment in front of all possible entry points ?



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html