[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1364400844.15753.18.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 09:14:04 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>,
Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 1/3] net: frag, avoid several CPUs grabbing
same frag queue during LRU evictor loop
On Wed, 2013-03-27 at 16:55 +0100, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> The LRU list is protected by its own lock, since commit 3ef0eb0db4
> (net: frag, move LRU list maintenance outside of rwlock), and
> no-longer by a read_lock.
>
> This makes it possible, to remove the inet_frag_queue, which is about
> to be "evicted", from the LRU list head. This avoids the problem, of
> several CPUs grabbing the same frag queue.
>
> Note, cannot remove the inet_frag_lru_del() call in fq_unlink()
> called by inet_frag_kill(), because inet_frag_kill() is also used in
> other situations. Thus, we use list_del_init() to allow this
> double list_del to work.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
> ---
>
> net/ipv4/inet_fragment.c | 3 +++
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists