[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1364401308.15753.23.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 09:21:48 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>,
Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 2/3] net: use the frag lru_lock to protect
netns_frags.nqueues update
On Wed, 2013-03-27 at 16:55 +0100, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> Move the protection of netns_frags.nqueues updates under the LRU_lock,
> instead of the write lock. As they are located on the same cacheline,
> and this is also needed when transitioning to use per hash bucket locking.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
> ---
Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists