[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1365445303.3887.33.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 11:21:43 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Paul Moore <pmoore@...hat.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
mvadkert@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcp: assign the sock correctly to an outgoing SYNACK
packet
On Mon, 2013-04-08 at 14:12 -0400, Paul Moore wrote:
>
> It seems a bit fragile to me, perhaps even hacky, but in some ways I guess it
> isn't anymore fragile than relying on skb->sk - as this problem demonstrates.
> My other concern is that adding this hook *correctly* is likely to touch a lot
> of files and may be a bit much so late in the 3.9 cycle, Dave, what say you?
I don't get it, 90ba9b1986b5ac4b2d18 was in 3.6, why do you care of
3.9 ?
I am preparing a fix right now. Not a revert, thank you.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists