[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5162F2C3.10107@hp.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 09:39:31 -0700
From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>
To: Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
CC: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
eric.dumazet@...il.com, shemminger@...tta.com, tgraf@...g.ch,
David.Laight@...LAB.COM
Subject: Re: [Patch net-next] tcp: add a global sysctl to control TCP delayed
ack
On 04/07/2013 06:45 PM, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-04-07 at 17:09 -0400, David Miller wrote:
>>
>> I'm not applying a patch that adds a global parameter for
>> an attribute which has per-path scope.
>
> Ok, I will make it per-route.
Is setting a per-route attribute to cover the backside of an application
for which source code is not available in this day and age really all
that much easier than hitting that application with an LD_PRELOAD
library to make the desired setsockopt() call?
rick jones
having flashbacks to similar conversations in other contexts in the 1990s...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists