[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130417194046.GF1408@breakpoint.cc>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 21:40:46 +0200
From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14]: netlink: memory mapped I/O
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net> wrote:
> The following patches contain an implementation of memory mapped I/O for
> netlink. The implementation is modelled after AF_PACKET memory mapped I/O
> with a few differences:
[..]
> Following are some numbers collected by Florian Westphal based on a
> slightly older version, which included an experimental patch for the
> nfnetlink_queue ordering issue.
I'd like to see a comparision with Eric Dumazets nfnetlink_queue zerocopy
patch [ ae08ce0021087a5d812d2714fb2a326ef9f8c450, netfilter:
nfnetlink_queue: zero copy support ].
The nice thing about that patch is its transparency to userspace, and
the avoidance of the 'nfnetlink_queue packet reordering' issue.
Sorry :)
Another issue with mmap is the need to preallocate the ring frame size.
After the gso avoidance change [ no skb_gso_segment calls anymore ],
we will need to be able to queue GSO/GRO skbs, which makes it necessary to
cope with 64k payload in the mmap case...
Cheers,
Florian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists