[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1366239463.2752.3.camel@bwh-desktop.uk.solarflarecom.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 23:57:43 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
CC: <davem@...emloft.net>, <netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/14] netlink: implement memory mapped sendmsg()
On Wed, 2013-04-17 at 18:47 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Add support for mmap'ed sendmsg() to netlink. Since the kernel validates
> received messages before processing them, the code makes sure userspace
> can't modify the message contents after invoking sendmsg(). To do that
> only a single mapping of the TX ring is allowed to exist and the socket
> must not be shared. If either of these two conditions does not hold, it
> falls back to copying.
[...]
Is this resistant against copy_to_process()?
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists