netdev - RE: [PATCH] pkt_sched: fix error return code in fw_change

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 18 Apr 2013 02:56:41 +0000
From:	"yongjun_wei@...ndmicro.com.cn" <yongjun_wei@...ndmicro.com.cn>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"weiyj.lk@...il.com" <weiyj.lk@...il.com>
CC:	"jhs@...atatu.com" <jhs@...atatu.com>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] pkt_sched: fix error return code in fw_change_attrs()

Sorry David,

It seems that the MAIL server send this dup mail, I am not know what happened
now. I see one mail I send this morning had been dup many times.

Regards,
Yongjun Wei

-----Original Message-----
From: David Miller [mailto:davem@...emloft.net] 
Sent: 2013年4月18日 10:51
To: weiyj.lk@...il.com
Cc: jhs@...atatu.com; Yongjun Wei (RD-CN); netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: fix error return code in fw_change_attrs()

From: Wei Yongjun <weiyj.lk@...il.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 10:49:10 +0800

> From: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@...ndmicro.com.cn>
> 
> Fix to return -EINVAL when tb[TCA_FW_MASK] is set and head->mask != 
> 0xFFFFFFFF instead of 0 (ifdef CONFIG_NET_CLS_IND and 
> tb[TCA_FW_INDEV]), as done elsewhere in this function.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@...ndmicro.com.cn>

You posted this patch twice.

What is the different between this version and the previous one posted?

You must always mention this when you post a patch multiple times.

<table class="TM_EMAIL_NOTICE"><tr><td><pre>
TREND MICRO EMAIL NOTICE
The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential 
and may be subject to copyright or other intellectual property protection. 
If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to use or 
disclose this information, and we request that you notify us by reply mail or
telephone and delete the original message from your mail system.
</pre></td></tr></table>