netdev - Re: Regression in 3.9 caused by "bridge: respect RFC2863 operational state"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <518183C8.8050606@openwrt.org>
Date:	Wed, 01 May 2013 23:06:16 +0200
From:	Felix Fietkau <nbd@...nwrt.org>
To:	Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
CC:	Krishna Chaitanya <chaitanya.mgit@...il.com>,
	linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
	Sebastian Gottschall <s.gottschall@...wrt.com>,
	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Regression in 3.9 caused by "bridge: respect RFC2863 operational
 state"

On 2013-05-01 10:21 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> What about using AF_PACKET bound to underlying wireless device and the
> packet type. You can even use BPF to filter.
As far as I know, AF_PACKET only works when not binding it to the packet
type (otherwise it get stolen by the rx handler).
Not binding it to the packet type and using BPF to filter is expensive
on small embedded devices with small caches. Still, this requires
userspace changes, so we need a different solution.

> Another alternative would be to have bridge accept control frames on
> dormant device but not send.
Sounds good, will you send a patch for that?

- Felix

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html