netdev - Re: [PATCH v3b 1/3] tipc: cosmetic: clean up comments and break a long line

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20130501.134356.491039302692790983.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Wed, 01 May 2013 13:43:56 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	gerlando.falauto@...mile.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com,
	jon.maloy@...csson.com, erik.hugne@...csson.com,
	ying.xue@...driver.com, Holger.Brunck@...mile.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3b 1/3] tipc: cosmetic: clean up comments and break a
 long line

From: Gerlando Falauto <gerlando.falauto@...mile.com>
Date: Wed, 01 May 2013 19:35:09 +0200

> That I don't understand. I thought it would be the other way around,
> that's why I resubmitted only the one which changed.

Any patch you submit I assume you test applied yourself successfully,
therefore by submitting it you are saying that you validated them
as a series explicitly or know that the other patches have no conflicts.

Also, please never submit new versions of patches in replies to older
patch discussions.

Chain replies in order to construct a series are OK, especially when
you provide a proper "[PATCH 0/N] ..." initial posting explaining
the series.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html