[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5181574E.8060909@keymile.com>
Date: Wed, 01 May 2013 19:56:30 +0200
From: Gerlando Falauto <gerlando.falauto@...mile.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com"
<sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
"jon.maloy@...csson.com" <jon.maloy@...csson.com>,
"erik.hugne@...csson.com" <erik.hugne@...csson.com>,
"ying.xue@...driver.com" <ying.xue@...driver.com>,
"Brunck, Holger" <Holger.Brunck@...mile.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3b 1/3] tipc: cosmetic: clean up comments and break a long line
Hi,
On 05/01/2013 07:43 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Gerlando Falauto <gerlando.falauto@...mile.com>
> Date: Wed, 01 May 2013 19:35:09 +0200
>
>> That I don't understand. I thought it would be the other way around,
>> that's why I resubmitted only the one which changed.
>
> Any patch you submit I assume you test applied yourself successfully,
> therefore by submitting it you are saying that you validated them
> as a series explicitly or know that the other patches have no conflicts.
I understand, you're right. I hope adding "Changes from v(n-1): None"
should also be enough to say that further review should not be necessary
as the patch is identical to the previous version.
> Also, please never submit new versions of patches in replies to older
> patch discussions.
>
> Chain replies in order to construct a series are OK, especially when
> you provide a proper "[PATCH 0/N] ..." initial posting explaining
> the series.
>
OK, thanks.
Gerlando
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists