[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130503000812.GY19814@mtj.dyndns.org>
Date: Thu, 2 May 2013 17:08:12 -0700
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>
Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, arve@...roid.com,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Gao feng <gaofeng@...fujitsu.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/10] af_unix: use freezable blocking calls in read
On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 06:35:08PM -0700, Colin Cross wrote:
> Avoid waking up every thread sleeping in read call on an AF_UNIX
> socket during suspend and resume by calling a freezable blocking
> call. Previous patches modified the freezer to avoid sending
> wakeups to threads that are blocked in freezable blocking calls.
>
> This call was selected to be converted to a freezable call because
> it doesn't hold any locks or release any resources when interrupted
> that might be needed by another freezing task or a kernel driver
> during suspend, and is a common site where idle userspace tasks are
> blocked.
Heh, so you are aware of the deadlock possibilities. Good selection
of spots. For all the conversion patches.
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists