[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <85487641.pdFCOjE3G7@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Sat, 04 May 2013 21:19:49 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, arve@...roid.com,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Gao feng <gaofeng@...fujitsu.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/10] af_unix: use freezable blocking calls in read
On Thursday, May 02, 2013 05:08:12 PM Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 06:35:08PM -0700, Colin Cross wrote:
> > Avoid waking up every thread sleeping in read call on an AF_UNIX
> > socket during suspend and resume by calling a freezable blocking
> > call. Previous patches modified the freezer to avoid sending
> > wakeups to threads that are blocked in freezable blocking calls.
> >
> > This call was selected to be converted to a freezable call because
> > it doesn't hold any locks or release any resources when interrupted
> > that might be needed by another freezing task or a kernel driver
> > during suspend, and is a common site where idle userspace tasks are
> > blocked.
>
> Heh, so you are aware of the deadlock possibilities. Good selection
> of spots. For all the conversion patches.
>
> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
I wonder if that includes [3/10] (just to get the record straight)?
Rafael
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists