netdev - Re: [PATCH RFC iproute2] Add VF link state control

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1368030286.1664.16.camel@dcbw.foobar.com>
Date:	Wed, 08 May 2013 11:24:46 -0500
From:	Dan Williams <dcbw@...hat.com>
To:	Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Cc:	Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	amirv@...lanox.com, ronye@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC iproute2] Add VF link state control

On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 09:17 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Wed,  8 May 2013 16:45:17 +0300
> Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com> wrote:
> 
> > From: Rony Efraim <ronye@...lanox.com>
> > 
> > Add link state per VF command
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Rony Efraim <ronye@...lanox.com>
> 
> Isn't this redundant with OPERSTATE and LOWER_DOWN?

I was going to say it was mostly redundant with the "set carrier from
userspace" patches from jpirko last December, but since a VF doesn't
appear to always have a netdev, it seems that functionality has to be
special-cased for VFs instead of being generic :(

Dan

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html