[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130513043140.GA2567@netboy>
Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 06:31:40 +0200
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To: Dong Zhu <bluezhudong@...il.com>
Cc: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
Bruce Allan <bruce.w.allan@...el.com>,
Carolyn Wyborny <carolyn.wyborny@...el.com>,
Don Skidmore <donald.c.skidmore@...el.com>,
Greg Rose <gregory.v.rose@...el.com>,
Peter P Waskiewicz Jr <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com>,
Alex Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>,
John Ronciak <john.ronciak@...el.com>,
Tushar Dave <tushar.n.dave@...el.com>,
Matthew Vick <matthew.vick@...el.com>,
Jacob Keller <Jacob.e.keller@...el.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] igb: add a method to get the nic hw time stamping
policy
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 10:12:36AM +0800, Dong Zhu wrote:
>
> Can I use the 'flags' which members of hwtstamp_config to judge the
> ioctl request instead ? If not could you plz give me a new way to
> resolve this issue ?
You could use the flags field, as it has no definition yet.
But you still need to explain why this new functionality is needed in
the first place:
- You can query an interface's time stamping capabilities with the
GET_TS_INFO ethtool command.
- You can choose a setting with SIOCSHWTSTAMP.
What more do you need?
Thanks,
Richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists