[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1368630754.3768.14.camel@LTIRV-MCHAN1.corp.ad.broadcom.com>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 08:12:34 -0700
From: "Michael Chan" <mchan@...adcom.com>
To: "David Laight" <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
cc: "Nithin Nayak Sujir" <nsujir@...adcom.com>,
"Eric Dumazet" <eric.dumazet@...il.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 net 2/2] tg3: Fix data corruption on 5725 with
TSO
On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 09:56 +0100, David Laight wrote:
> > > If the 'fix' is to relocate the skb you are doomed to lose regardless
> > > of the check - unless you are willing to reallocate a lot of times,
> > > and without freeing the old skb.
> > > I'd assumed the 'fix' was to disable the relevant offload.
> >
> > We relocate once and then drop the packet if we encounter additional
> > errors, including OOM, DMA mapping error, 4G boundary, etc. The new
> > linear skb should not hit the 4G boundary again. The room between the
> > end of this current buffer and 4G isn't big enough for the new linear
> > skb.
>
> The first skb might be just below the 4G boundary and the
> second just below the 8G one.
>
We will discard the packet if that happens. I think the probabilty is
very small.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists