[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51A464B9.5080106@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 11:03:05 +0300
From: Eliezer Tamir <eliezer.tamir@...ux.intel.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <erdnetdev@...il.com>
CC: Dave Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
Don Skidmore <donald.c.skidmore@...el.com>,
e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, HPA <hpa@...or.com>,
Eilon Greenstien <eilong@...adcom.com>,
Or Gerlitz <or.gerlitz@...il.com>,
Alex Rosenbaum <alexr@...lanox.com>,
Eliezer Tamir <eliezer@...ir.org.il>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 net-next 1/5] net: add napi_id and hash
On 28/05/2013 03:28, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-05-27 at 10:44 +0300, Eliezer Tamir wrote:
>> +extern void napi_hash_add(struct napi_struct *napi);
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * napi_hash_del - remove a NAPI from blobal table
>
> global
Thank you
(my typing is almost as bad as my spelling, please don't tell my mom)
>> @@ -166,6 +167,10 @@ static struct list_head offload_base __read_mostly;
>> DEFINE_RWLOCK(dev_base_lock);
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(dev_base_lock);
>>
>> +atomic_t napi_gen_id;
>
> Not sure we need an atomic, we are protected by RTNL anyway.
With an atomic we don't need the RTNL in any of the napi_id functions.
One less thing to worry about when we try to remove the RTNL.
-Eliezer
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists