netdev - Re: [PATCH v5 net-next 2/5] net: implement support for low latency socket polling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <51A46507.3060901@linux.intel.com>
Date:	Tue, 28 May 2013 11:04:23 +0300
From:	Eliezer Tamir <eliezer.tamir@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC:	Dave Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
	Don Skidmore <donald.c.skidmore@...el.com>,
	e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, HPA <hpa@...or.com>,
	Eilon Greenstien <eilong@...adcom.com>,
	Or Gerlitz <or.gerlitz@...il.com>,
	Alex Rosenbaum <alexr@...lanox.com>,
	Eliezer Tamir <eliezer@...ir.org.il>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 net-next 2/5] net: implement support for low latency
 socket polling

On 28/05/2013 03:26, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-05-27 at 10:44 +0300, Eliezer Tamir wrote:

>> diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h
>> index 66772cf..c7c3ea6 100644
>> --- a/include/net/sock.h
>> +++ b/include/net/sock.h
>> @@ -281,6 +281,7 @@ struct cg_proto;
>>     *	@sk_error_report: callback to indicate errors (e.g. %MSG_ERRQUEUE)
>>     *	@sk_backlog_rcv: callback to process the backlog
>>     *	@sk_destruct: called at sock freeing time, i.e. when all refcnt == 0
>> +  *	@sk_napi_id: id of the last napi context to receive data for sk
>>    */
>>   struct sock {
>>   	/*
>> @@ -399,6 +400,9 @@ struct sock {
>>   	int			(*sk_backlog_rcv)(struct sock *sk,
>>   						  struct sk_buff *skb);
>>   	void                    (*sk_destruct)(struct sock *sk);
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_NET_LL_RX_POLL
>> +	unsigned int		sk_napi_id;
>> +#endif
>>   };
>
> I believe this is a bad choice for data locality.
>
> I would rather move it in the same cache line than sk_rxhash

I will move it to right after sk_rxhash.

-Eliezer
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html