[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <51A6F642020000780009B66A@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 06:48:34 +0100
From: "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@...e.com>
To: <ja@....bg>
Cc: <wensong@...ux-vs.org>, <pablo@...filter.org>,
<horms@...ge.net.au>, <lvs-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ip_vs_sh: fix build
>>> Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg> 05/29/13 9:28 PM >>>
>On Wed, 29 May 2013, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> --- 3.10-rc3/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sh.c
>> +++ 3.10-rc3-ip_vs_sh-build/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sh.c
>> @@ -67,8 +67,8 @@ struct ip_vs_sh_bucket {
>> #define IP_VS_SH_TAB_MASK (IP_VS_SH_TAB_SIZE - 1)
>>
>> struct ip_vs_sh_state {
>> - struct ip_vs_sh_bucket buckets[IP_VS_SH_TAB_SIZE];
>> struct rcu_head rcu_head;
>> + struct ip_vs_sh_bucket buckets[IP_VS_SH_TAB_SIZE];
>
> Your fix reminds me about the same problem
>I noticed for LBLC (may be due to 10 bits) during development
>but forgot to check the other schedulers. The same solution
>is needed also for DH. OTOH, LBLC and LBLCR are correct.
>Do you prefer to provide similar fix for ip_vs_dh.c or
>I have to take care?
CONFIG_IP_VS_DH_TAB_BITS is always 8 (due to not coming from any
Kconfig setting), and hence not a problem at this point. If it is being planned
to make configurable, then that change should at once flip the structure
members.
Jan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists