netdev - Re: [PATCH 2/4 net-next] tcp: refactor undo functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 30 May 2013 18:07:22 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	ycheng@...gle.com
Cc:	ncardwell@...gle.com, edumazet@...gle.com, nanditad@...gle.com,
	aterzis@...gle.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4 net-next] tcp: refactor undo functions

From: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 17:20:12 -0700

> Refactor and relocate various functions or variables to prepare the
> undo fix.  Remove some unused function arguments. Rename tcp_undo_cwr
> to tcp_undo_cwnd_reduction to be consistent with the rest of
> CWR related function names.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>

Applied, but:

> -static void tcp_undo_cwr(struct sock *sk, const bool undo_ssthresh)
> +static void tcp_undo_cwnd_reduction(struct sock *sk, const bool undo_ssthresh,
> +				    bool unmark_loss)

Both bool arguments seem const to me.  Please audit the rest of the
functions you changed and send a cleanup patch to consistently use
const wherever possible.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html