lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 4 Jun 2013 20:22:02 +0300
From:	Mike Rapoport <mike.rapoport@...ellosystems.com>
To:	David Stevens <dlstevens@...ibm.com>
Cc:	Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, netdev-owner@...r.kernel.org,
	Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
Subject: Re: [RFC] vxlan: convert remote list to list_rcu

On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 12:29:05PM -0400, David Stevens wrote:
> Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org> wrote on 06/04/2013
> 12:00:31 PM:
>
> > I am still not 100% convinced of the use case of providing multiple
> > destinations.
> > It seems like either a solution for migrating guests, a way to do
> > SPAN, or a weird
> > form of multicast.
>
> The use is, as you would say it, a weird form of multicast. It
> is to allow forwarding MAC multicasts without relying on the
> underlying network having multicast routers in the same domain.

For instance, public clouds do not allow multicasts, and vxlan with
multiple destinations would be a neat SDN solution there.

> > Wouldn't it be better to use something like TC actions for these
> > special cases and
> > handle it at the IP layer rather than having to add so much
> > complexity into the
> > VXLAN driver itself.
>
> This isn't a "special case" for DOVE -- it is the mechanism
> for doing MAC multicasts. I don't agree that the code is
> complex -- it simply replaces what was a vxlan_rdst with a
> list of vxlan_rdsts. And, no, I don't believe it can be
> done with equivalent performance using external mechanisms.
>
> Didn't we have this discussion when the patch went in?
>
>                                                         +-DLS
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ