[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130604222135.67eedab8@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2013 22:21:35 +0200
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jbrouer@...hat.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>, David Miller <davem@...hat.com>,
j.vimal@...il.com, Michal Soltys <soltys@....info>,
Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>,
Jussi Kivilinna <jussi.kivilinna@...et.fi>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>,
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...e.dk>,
Dave Taht <dave.taht@...il.com>, bloat@...ts.bufferbloat.net,
Dan Siemon <dan@...erfire.com>,
Jim Gettys <jg@...edesktop.org>,
Steven Barth <cyrus@...nwrt.org>, Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net_sched: htb: do not mix 1ns and 64ns time units
On Tue, 04 Jun 2013 10:11:48 -0700
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
>
> commit 56b765b79 ("htb: improved accuracy at high rates") added
> another regression for low rates, because it mixes 1ns and 64ns time
> units.
>
> So the maximum delay (mbuffer) was not 60 second, but 937 ms.
>
> Lets convert all time fields to 1ns as 64bit arches are becoming the
> norm.
I'm of-cause happy as I need this fixed for big-HW machines at Red Hat.
But how is this 64-bit usage going to affect performance for smaller
ARM/MIPS based home routers, where shaping at these low rates is more
relevant? (I'm just asking because I don't know, and just test this
on a 24-CPU machine).
Tested-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
I have tested you patch, and it works for me.
Tested shaping at 100Kbit/s:
- max "rate 100656bit" on dev lo
- max "rate 102016bit" on a real 1 Gbit/s NIC (dev eth63).
- max "rate 103256bit" on a real 10 Gbit/s NIC (dev eth31).
The traffic "of-cause" spikes due to the GSO frames, if measuring the
traffic at a higher resolution (I've seen upto 3 sec without traffic).
Thanks for the quick fix! :-)))
--
Best regards,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer
MSc.CS, Sr. Network Kernel Developer at Red Hat
Author of http://www.iptv-analyzer.org
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
Reproducer commands:
tc qdisc add dev lo root handle 1: htb default 1
tc class add dev lo parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 100kbit
netserver
netperf -t TCP_STREAM -l 60 -H 127.0.0.1 -- -m 1024
Measuring the qdisc "rate" via:
tc -s -d class show dev lo classid 1:1
Data:
=====
>From dev "lo":
--------------
class htb 1:1 root prio 0 quantum 1250 rate 100000bit ceil 100000bit burst 1600b/1 mpu 0b overhead 0b cburst 1600b/1 mpu 0b overhead 0b level 0
Sent 597719 bytes 64 pkt (dropped 942, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
rate 100656bit 1pps backlog 0b 1p requeues 0
lended: 64 borrowed: 0 giants: 0
tokens: -27387576 ctokens: -27387576
>From 1Gbit/s dev eth63:
-----------------------
class htb 1:1 root prio 0 quantum 1250 rate 100000bit ceil 100000bit burst 1600b/1 mpu 0b overhead 0b cburst 1600b/1 mpu 0b overhead 0b level 0
Sent 1801152 bytes 3224 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
rate 102016bit 9pps backlog 0b 12p requeues 0
lended: 2284 borrowed: 0 giants: 0
tokens: -18923820 ctokens: -18923820
>From 10Gbit/s dev eth31:
------------------------
class htb 1:1 root prio 0 quantum 1250 rate 100000bit ceil 100000bit burst 1600b/1 mpu 0b overhead 0b cburst 1600b/1 mpu 0b overhead 0b level 0
Sent 855814 bytes 581 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
rate 103256bit 9pps backlog 0b 9p requeues 0
lended: 81 borrowed: 0 giants: 0
tokens: -45419150 ctokens: -45419150
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists