[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1370379031.24311.226.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2013 13:50:31 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jbrouer@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>, David Miller <davem@...hat.com>,
j.vimal@...il.com, Michal Soltys <soltys@....info>,
Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>,
Jussi Kivilinna <jussi.kivilinna@...et.fi>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>,
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...e.dk>,
Dave Taht <dave.taht@...il.com>, bloat@...ts.bufferbloat.net,
Dan Siemon <dan@...erfire.com>,
Jim Gettys <jg@...edesktop.org>,
Steven Barth <cyrus@...nwrt.org>, Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net_sched: htb: do not mix 1ns and 64ns time units
On Tue, 2013-06-04 at 22:21 +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> But how is this 64-bit usage going to affect performance for smaller
> ARM/MIPS based home routers, where shaping at these low rates is more
> relevant? (I'm just asking because I don't know, and just test this
> on a 24-CPU machine).
Well, by definition shaping at low rates is mostly using the timer
infra, and its already 64bit. You'll hardly spend time in HTB.
Note that psched_time_t is already 64bit wide.
Only psched_tdiff_t is 'unsigned long', and the change I made in this
patch will not change performance even on 32bit hosts.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists