[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1370353617.24311.201.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2013 06:46:57 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jbrouer@...hat.com>
Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH nf-next] netfilter: xt_socket: add XT_SOCKET_NOWILDCARD
flag
On Tue, 2013-06-04 at 11:10 +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> On Mon, 03 Jun 2013 15:57:29 -0700
> Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> >
> > xt_socket module can be a nice replacement to conntrack module
> > in some cases (SYN filtering for example)
> >
> > But it lacks the ability to match the 3rd packet of TCP
> > handshake (ACK coming from the client).
> >
> > Add a XT_SOCKET_NOWILDCARD flag to disable the wildcard mechanism
>
> Sorry, but I'm not sure I understand your description.
>
> What is the effect of adding the XT_SOCKET_NOWILDCARD flag?
> It almost sound like it adds the ability to match the 3rd packet of TCP
> handshake (ACK coming from the client), is that the case?
>
Well, if the found socket happens to be a LISTEN socket, we ignore the
socket if it was bound to 0.0.0.0
Thats the wildcard thing in xt_socket. Not clear why its there, but
thing is : we apparently have to keep this behavior by default.
So yes, the ACK packet from the client is not matched by current
xt_socket.
After my patch, it is matched.
I CCed you because you mentioned using conntrack for SYN filtering :
xt_socket can be a way to do the same thing without the conntrack
overhead, for locally terminated traffic.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists