netdev - Re: [PATCH nf-next] netfilter: xt_socket: add XT_SOCKET

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130604163053.08c0d80f@redhat.com>
Date:	Tue, 4 Jun 2013 16:30:53 +0200
From:	Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jbrouer@...hat.com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:	Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
	Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH nf-next] netfilter: xt_socket: add XT_SOCKET_NOWILDCARD
 flag

On Tue, 04 Jun 2013 06:46:57 -0700
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 2013-06-04 at 11:10 +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> > On Mon, 03 Jun 2013 15:57:29 -0700
> > Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> > > 
> > > xt_socket module can be a nice replacement to conntrack module
> > > in some cases (SYN filtering for example)
> > > 
> > > But it lacks the ability to match the 3rd packet of TCP
> > > handshake (ACK coming from the client).
> > > 
> > > Add a XT_SOCKET_NOWILDCARD flag to disable the wildcard mechanism
> > 
> > Sorry, but I'm not sure I understand your description.
> > 
> > What is the effect of adding the XT_SOCKET_NOWILDCARD flag?
> > It almost sound like it adds the ability to match the 3rd packet of
> > TCP handshake (ACK coming from the client), is that the case?
> > 
> 
> Well, if the found socket happens to be a LISTEN socket, we ignore the
> socket if it was bound to 0.0.0.0
> 
> Thats the wildcard thing in xt_socket. Not clear why its there, but
> thing is : we apparently have to keep this behavior by default.
> 
> So yes, the ACK packet from the client is not matched by current
> xt_socket.
> 
> After my patch, it is matched.
> 
> I CCed you because you mentioned using conntrack for SYN filtering :
> xt_socket can be a way to do the same thing without the conntrack
> overhead, for locally terminated traffic.

Thank you for Cc'ing me.  I didn't realize that the module could be
used in this manor.  Much appreciated! :-)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html