[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51B1D112.8030805@cogentembedded.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2013 16:24:50 +0400
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, nobuhiro.iwamatsu.yj@...esas.com,
linux-sh@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/8] sh_eth: deal with #ifdef'fery
Hello.
On 07-06-2013 3:05, David Miller wrote:
>> This series of 8 patches are against Dave's 'net-next.git' repository.
>> The series deals mostly with excess #ifdef'fery in the 'sh_eth' driver.
>> It doesn't yet get rid of all the #ifdef'fery but that's a matter of another
>> patchset. The last patch (it was almost in the middle of the series before),
>> contrariwise, adds one missing #ifdef...
>> [1/8] sh_eth: remove #ifdef around EDSR and GECMR bit definitions
>> [2/8] sh_eth: use EDSR_ENALL to set EDSR
>> [3/8] sh_eth: remove duplicate sh_eth_set_duplex() definitions
>> [4/8] sh_eth: remove SH_ETH_HAS_TSU
>> [5/8] sh_eth: add IRQ flags to 'struct sh_eth_cpu_data'
>> [6/8] sh_eth: remove #ifdef around sh_eth_select_mii()
>> [7/8] sh_eth: consolidate sh_eth_reset()
>> [8/8] sh_eth: enclose PM code into #ifdef CONFIG_PM
> All applied, thanks.
Thanks to you for quick reaction.
> I think you should have two sets of const netdev_ops to cover the two
> cases, instead of writing to a non-const netdev_ops. Could you send a
> follow-on patch which does that?
Sigh, I told Iwamatsu-san to do it, but he failed to respin the
patches. OK, I'll look into it later, when I have time.
> Thanks.
WBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists