netdev - [PATCH, resend] xen-netback: don't de-reference vif pointer after having called xenvif

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <51B7116202000078000DD069@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
Date:	Tue, 11 Jun 2013 11:00:34 +0100
From:	"Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@...e.com>
To:	"David Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	<ian.campbell@...rix.com>, <xen-devel@...ts.xen.org>,
	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH, resend] xen-netback: don't de-reference vif pointer
 after having called xenvif_put()

When putting vif-s on the rx notify list, calling xenvif_put() must be
deferred until after the removal from the list and the issuing of the
notification, as both operations dereference the pointer.

Changing this got me to notice that the "irq" variable was effectively
unused (and was of too narrow type anyway).

Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>
Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>

---
 drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c |   11 ++++++-----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- 3.10-rc4/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
+++ 3.10-rc4-xen-netback-vif-use-after-free/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
@@ -662,7 +662,7 @@ static void xen_netbk_rx_action(struct x
 {
 	struct xenvif *vif = NULL, *tmp;
 	s8 status;
-	u16 irq, flags;
+	u16 flags;
 	struct xen_netif_rx_response *resp;
 	struct sk_buff_head rxq;
 	struct sk_buff *skb;
@@ -771,13 +771,13 @@ static void xen_netbk_rx_action(struct x
 					 sco->meta_slots_used);
 
 		RING_PUSH_RESPONSES_AND_CHECK_NOTIFY(&vif->rx, ret);
-		irq = vif->irq;
-		if (ret && list_empty(&vif->notify_list))
-			list_add_tail(&vif->notify_list, &notify);
 
 		xenvif_notify_tx_completion(vif);
 
-		xenvif_put(vif);
+		if (ret && list_empty(&vif->notify_list))
+			list_add_tail(&vif->notify_list, &notify);
+		else
+			xenvif_put(vif);
 		npo.meta_cons += sco->meta_slots_used;
 		dev_kfree_skb(skb);
 	}
@@ -785,6 +785,7 @@ static void xen_netbk_rx_action(struct x
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(vif, tmp, &notify, notify_list) {
 		notify_remote_via_irq(vif->irq);
 		list_del_init(&vif->notify_list);
+		xenvif_put(vif);
 	}
 
 	/* More work to do? */



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html